The Past Life Exploration Game — Luminous Partnerships examination

Eleven questions. Nine of eleven passes, and you can take it again as often as you like.

How does the module present the Past Life Exploration Game with regard to belief?

It works whether past lives are literal, useful fiction or something in between It requires both partners to accept reincarnation as literal historical fact first It is designed to prove reincarnation by scientific standards It only works for people who already have strong psychic gifts
What does the module criticise about most couples' relationship mythology?

It is too grand, too dramatic and too full of romantic fantasy It is too private, since couples rarely share it with anyone It is small, reducing a vast mystery to chemistry, compatibility and timing It focuses far too heavily on each partner's past relationships and old heartbreaks
What is the most accessible entry point to the game for a sceptical partner?

Consulting a professional past-life reader together Hypnosis sessions with a therapist Treating it as collaborative creative mythology Studying historical records for evidence
What does the module claim about the relationship between imagination and intuition?

Imagination is intuition; the line between them is blurrier than culture admits Intuition is reliable, but imagination is mere invention and play Imagination always distorts true intuition and so it should be distrusted in practice They are opposites and must be kept apart during the practice
How do partners build a scenario together in the game?

One partner interviews the other using a list of prepared questions about the past They read about historical eras together and simply choose one Both partners write separate stories alone and then compare them One describes a sensed lifetime and the other listens, then adds what resonates
What does the module say about the themes that emerge across imagined lifetimes?

They almost always involve royalty, great wealth and positions of power over others They cluster around dynamics that mirror what you are working with now They tend to repeat the plots of films you have both seen They are random and have no real bearing on the present
In the author's example, what past-life scenario illuminated an anxious-avoidant pattern?

A teacher and a student meeting in secret in an ancient Egyptian temple A silent monk and a village woman who brought food to the monastery Two soldiers separated for years by a long and bitter war Rival merchants in a busy port who slowly became partners
After seeing the monk scenario, what practical change did the couple make?

He reassured her before deep work that absorption was not abandonment She agreed never again to ask him for connection or time He gave up his creative work entirely to be more available They decided to live in separate homes in order to protect their space
How does the game affect fear that the relationship might end?

It increases the fear by raising the stakes of this particular lifetime It removes any commitment to this lifetime It promises the relationship will never end It eases that fear, allowing more presence and less anxiety
What question might a couple ask when exploring parallel timelines?

In which timeline do we have the most wealth and comfort? In what parallel timeline have we already figured out what we're stuck on? In which timeline did we never meet or fall in love at all, and what was that like? Which timeline would be the easiest one to escape into?
How does the module distinguish the game from spiritual bypassing?

It replaces the need for difficult conversations about behaviour and its impact It advises avoiding practical change in favour of cosmic context It supplements practical skills and does not excuse behaviour as karma It explains every conflict as destiny that cannot be changed